Sunday 29 April 2012

Francis & Dominic: The Rise of the Mendicant Orders


Week 9: Francis and Dominic - Poverty and City Life: Tutorial Discussion Post            
By: Paul and Amber

Paul's thoughts,

In Celano's account of St. Francis' life, it can be at times hard to read it like you would a modern biography, giving a very one-eyed look at his life. But this is in part because it was written shortly after his death, and as a new saint. However, it gives a good insight into his life, or his perceived life, giving an ideal look at a saint, possibly the ideal look of a man in the Christian sense. Francis is portrayed as fanatically Christian in this. He and his followers practiced mortification of their bodies, and placed themselves in stress positions to keep from falling out of concentration or asleep during prayer. However, the other view you get of Francis is of an intensely loving man, loving of everyone and thing around him, in a very evangelical Christian sense, trying to preach to everyone and everything. This includes an Egyptian Sultan during a Crusade and animals.
In Celano's text, there is a large focus on Francis' relationship with the natural world, and in particular, birds. He writes about Francis’ famed way with animals, reporting that they would listen to him preaching the gospels and also that they would be calm around him, as if actually listening. It's explained that he acted and believed it was as important as if he was preaching to people, seeing animals as other creatures of God, reasoning that they too should be able to listen to the word of God. I thought this was actually a very modern idea, like the early animal rights movement but with a heavily Christian motivation.
Le Goff’s article mainly focuses on Francis’ life and the increasing urbanisation of the period. In it he argues that the urbanism helped to make Francis’ order possible, allowing his preaching and lifestyle, and making them able to reach a large audience in the towns and cities. However, this was also a danger as similar movements, like the Waldensians, had been accused of heresy by the Papacy as a result mainly of ‘taking over one of the monopolies of the clergy, namely preaching’.


St Francis preaching to the birds - by Giotto
St Dominic
Amber's thoughts
Both Saint Francis (1181 – 1226) and Saint Dominic 1170 – 1221) were
born during a time of prosperity for Medieval Europe.  With a massive
increase in population, land clearances and advancement in farming
were beginning to make life in Western Europe a little easier.  Groups
of people were beginning to form villages that usually centred around
a church or castle and the urbanisation movement began.  These new
urban villages were centres for culture, the economy and politics but
these people also needed a change from the sometimes uneducated and
unmotivated teachings of the church and this is where the Franciscan
and Dominican orders emerged.


The Franciscans

St. Francis preached the rewards and virtues of a religious life and
soon gained followers.  They were to live among the people and own no
possessions as he insisted on complete poverty.  The Franciscans sought
to imitate the life of Christ and this appealed to many lay people.
His charismatic manner and appreciation of the natural world and
equality within the human world also appealed to many lay people and
attracted women followers such as a St. Clare of Assisi.  Although at
the time it was not seen a right for women to travel around the
countryside a preach St. Francis did not believe in these social
restrictions and gave them the same rule as the men.  Although he was
not successful and the women who followed him were confined and made
to follow St. Benedict’s Rule.


The Dominicans

Dominic Guzman a Spanish priest started the Dominican order.  They
were an order that revolved around education and the control of Cathar
Heresy and travelled from town to town engaging Cathar leaders in
public debate. They formed a base in Toulouse and followed the Rule of
St. Augustine.  Then in 1217 St. Dominic gave orders to his followers
to travel through Europe and infiltrate the Universities.  Unlike the
Franciscan order women who wanted to follow The Dominicans were
subject to strict enclosure in accordance to St. Dominic’s beliefs.

Saturday 21 April 2012

*** Lecture Recording Problems ***

Hi everyone

There have been some problems with the lecture recordings for Week 7. Please note the following message from Clare. If anyone is writing their essay topic on Week 7 and missed the lecture please let me know asap as I may be able to meet with you to go over the material.

'Unfortunately the audio of the week 7 lectures have not been recorded. The slides are available, however, on both MULO and Blackboard. I am very sorry for the inconvenience, but sometimes technology does fail. I know that some of you have clashes and need to rely on the recordings. I would urge, however, those of you who can attend the lectures to do so, because that is the only absolutely guaranteed way that you have of hearing the material'


Any questions or concerns at all please just let me know.

All the best,

Diana

Thursday 19 April 2012

Early Crusading


Week 8: Early Crusading - Tutorial Discussion Post


Hi everyone!

Remember that this week we will not be having lectures or tutorials due to the ANZAC day public holiday. However, you are all expected to comment on this blog post and your comments this week will form your participation mark for the week.

A couple of quick notes before I get into the topic for this week.

1) You may have noticed that I have set up a poll on the right-hand bar of the blog on the library tutorial. I would be extremely grateful if you could take a second to vote on how useful (or not) you found the library tutorial I ran in Week 6. This will help me improve my lesson in future years and will also provide myself and Clare with valuable feedback on the usefulness of the library tutorial in general.

2) Week 9 presenters - remember that your blog post is due (emailed to me) by 12pm, Thursday April 26th
.........

Right! On to the Crusades!

I know that we have already had a lecture on the First Crusade but we have yet to have an opportunity to discuss it. Now is the time! Our readings for this week, you'll have noticed, consist of a number of accounts of Pope Urban II's speech at the Council of Clermont in 1095 in which he put out the call for the First Crusade. Our secondary source is an article by Christopher Tyerman on the development of the Crusading ideal and how it was intertwined with European society at the time. Christopher Tyerman is a leading historian of the Crusades and later this term we will be introduced to the work of another expert, Jonathan Riley-Smith.

I'd like everyone to focus this week on the tutorial discussion questions in the reader when considering their comments as I think the questions are quite comprehensive. I've added a couple of questions about the primary source to also help get folks thinking about the complex issue of crusading.

Christians and Muslims in battle during the Crusades


Questions:

1) Discuss the accounts of Urban's speech. In what ways do they differ?
2) What reasons can you give for these variations?
3) According to Urban, who are the enemies of Christendom? How are they characterized? (ie. by ethnicity, religion, etc.) Does Urban seem to have any understanding of Islam?
4) Why should Christians go on crusade? What benefits will they receive according to Urban?
5) What goal does Urban set for the crusaders? What is their mission to the Holy Land meant to achieve?
6) Where is the Holy Land?

7) Tyerman locates the origin of the crusades in a particular 'symbiosis of interests and values'. What does he mean by this?
8) Tyerman argues that although crusading emerges out of a distinctive tradition in the Latin West, it also contained unique and novel features. What are these features?
9) What does Tyerman mean when he says that ' crusading was not a monolithic movement'?
10) Tyerman says that the effect of the crusades on Europe and Europeans tended to be of 3 sorts, what were they?

*** As always your posts can reflect on these questions or on any other aspects of the readings you found interesting or challenging ***


Pope Urban II calling the First Crusade

......
Finally I'd just like to draw everyone's attention here to a wonderful exhibit of medieval Persian manuscripts that is currently on at the State Library of Victoria. In our course we only briefly encounter the medieval Islamic world and for anyone interested in understanding more about the culture of the Middle East in this period I highly recommend going to this exhibit. It's absolutely beautiful!

http://exhibitions.slv.vic.gov.au/love-and-devotion

From the State Library Exhibit 'Love and Devotion'

From the State Library Exhibit 'Love and Devotion'

Thursday 12 April 2012

Eve, Mary Magdalene and the Virgin Mary - Medieval Women and Gender Roles

Week 7: Relics and Devotional Life / Medieval Men and Women - Tutorial Discussion Post
By: Tori, Hannah and Mimi


Tori's thoughts

Life for women in the Middle Ages, as shown by the readings for this week, especially the section by Christiane Klapish-Zuber, was not all princesses and wealth. For some women in the Middle Ages it's true they were lucky enough to be born into wealthy families of privilege, but even then a woman would often be used as a tool to buy peace through marriage, her own wishes often ignored.
The majority of women in this time were peasants. Spending their lives toiling in the fields and tending to the household chores and raising children. 
Real life for women in the Middle Ages was very different from the images we are often fed through Hollywood’s glamorous interpretations. Women had to be hard working and strong. They were the central figure for family life but were subjected to the least amounts of human rights.
The definition of a woman revolved around the men she was associated with. For example, if a woman was married to a brewer she would be considered the brewer's wife no matter what personal traits or skills of her own she possessed. 
The picture that Christine Klapish-Zuber paints of the medieval woman is, in her own words, gloomy. But, it is a realistic representation giving a thorough description of the life of medieval women. 


Hannah's thoughts

It’s really interesting how the two texts differed in their presentation of women in Medieval Europe.  I won’t discuss the second text because I don’t want to overlap the other two girls' posts.

There seems to be two different opinions of women in Medieval Europe, one where women are seen as sinners, due to Eve, and the contrasting view that women bought people closer to God, by Mary giving birth to Jesus.
Women were characterised by their sexuality either as a virgin, widow or married. Virginity was regarded as the highest and most righteous status; however, women were also expected to bear children. With Mary being both a virgin and the bearer of Jesus she set an unattainable goal of maintaining her virtue as a virgin and fulfilling her expectations of society and the Bible by being a mother. By giving birth to God, Mary bought people closer to Him, and raised the opinion held of women.
 Women still seemed to be quite oppressed, maybe not as badly as in Ancient Rome, however, definitely viewed as less virtuous than men despite Mary providing a stronger link between God and people.
Mary Magdalene is presented as a devout Christian and a realistic goal for women to strive towards. She was sinful and transformed into the ideal Christian, spreading the name of Christ and performing miracles with the help of God.
Eve of course is viewed negatively due to her committing the first sin which shattered the perfect world that was the Garden of Eden. Eve is the main reason women were viewed as more likely to sin then men.
Scholastica is presented as a woman with a very close link to God. It seems implied that she knew she was going to die soon and wished to spend more time with her brother, using her close bond with God she is said to have caused a storm which prevented his leaving. Then, when she died, she visited her brother whilst being carried by angels. This reinforces the wonder of God and how those who formed a close bond with him would be blessed by the Heavens.
Some women seem to be quite awe inspiring in Medieval Europe and treated as equals to men, such as Joan of Arc, who managed to gather respect from many. For a woman in Medieval Europe Joan of Arc accomplished amazing feats, that’s inarguable, but was it through ingenuity, the grace of God, luck or something entirely different that allowed her to accomplish so much?
How realistic a goal do you think Mary Magdalene set for Medieval European Women? 


*** Please post any comments, questions or reflections ***